Slamming the International Energy Agency's (IEA; Paris) World Energy Outlook 2009 as a "political document" presenting "unrealistic" numbers of future oil supplies, Sweden's Uppsala University warns governments to review global oil supplies for themselves. The Guardian reports that Kjell Aleklett, a professor and head of Uppsala's Global Energy Systems group, and others, including Simon Snowden from the University of Liverpool, charge that "IEA is expecting the oil to be extracted at a pace never previously seen without any justification for this assumption." They note that there is "particular concern about high future production rates from "unconventional" sources such as tar sands", numbers that were first presented in the 2008 Outlook without explanations, and which are presented once again in the 2009 report. Uppsala has done a scientific analysis of the "dubious" data in IEA's Outlook Reports, to be published in the journal Energy Policy.
Earlier, The Guardian had reported1 that IEA whistleblowers had expressed deep misgivings about the way energy statistics were being influenced upwards by the US, to avoid a stock market "panic" if the real potential for future oil scarcity were revealed. EIA dismisses the suggestions of political influence, noting that the annual report is reviewed by 200 different and independent experts. Aleklett, who estimates that oil "peaked" in 2008, replies: "I am a scientist, not an economist or a politician. I believe in the facts and if someone can prove me wrong I will happily change my mind."

| 
| Mobile 